Republicus
"Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me. I lift my lamp beside the golden door." The Statue of Liberty (P.S. Please be so kind as to enter through the proper channels and in an orderly fashion)
32 Comments:
That's the original all right, Unfortunately, the current form government slouches towards Marx and would prefer remaking it in Marx's image.
Yes. And they sow strife and rile up a democratic mob to stoke anarchy and demolish the republic to arrive at that Marxist oligarchy.
And they know it. And they know that I and others like you know it, and because we're a threat to their efforts to scam the unread *hoi polloi*--because we're tattletales, as far as they're concerned, but really the roosters protecting the hens from the foxes--their need to discredit us via ridicule and bullying (so we won't be listened to and/or be silenced) reaches the vitriolic levels we see here and at large.
Well, he does sound like a little chicken humper.
John, I need to apologize. I was upset at the trolls and took it out on you. But you are still one of the good guys.
I will just ignore the riff raff. Their whole purpose is to divide and conquer...
Consider me back on board...if you will have me back.
Oh Lord. The winy moron is back... Hey, how does your gay cousin feel about you cheering captain moron's drive to keep them from getting married?
""You get the same equal rights that we do when we have a civil partnership. Heterosexual people get married. We can have civil partnerships." ---Elton John
Good old seperate but equal. Might as well segregate the schools again too.
No need to apologize, Kelly. Welcome back. Just don't be so thin-skinned. They do want to divide and conquer, and or harass and bully into retreat and silence, but, unless you let them do that, they're just yapping chihuahuas who want attention. There is zero substance to their words. Ignore them. Or kick them in the head to hear them yelp, whimper, and run back to their kennel to drink some more Kool Aid before coming in here, vomiting it up, and then commence yapping again.
The endless repetition of the predictable behavior only validates my psychological profiling of their mental illness beyond dispute.
John, Gotcha!
oh, for them...I was merely quoting Elton John...He said it, not me.
Homosexuals have exactly the same rights as hetero's. There's nothing preventing them from marrying a member of the opposite sex, and a heterosexual can't marry a member of the same sex.
They have EXACTLY the same rights.
Why about a hetero's right to marry a child or a close family member, anon? Is that discrimination... a violation of someone's "rights"? Why or why not?
So perhaps Captain Knownothing should forgo dispensing epithets until he's earned a superior one for himself. Here's your chance...
Ooops. Too bad, you blew it. Now stand up, brush off your knees, wipe the spit off your chin, and try again. How is it different?
btw - Capt. Moroni is not a "deity" from Mormon "mythology".
So please, demonstrate to us once again EXACTLY how stupid you are...
Hey Kelly, how do you feel about FJ equating your cousing to a Pedophile?
Errrr. That would be you, again, anon.
Perhaps you need to go back and re-read the actual question posed instead of substituting your own conclusions regarding the subject.
But then again, that would expose the vacuuity of your position for all to see, wouldn't it.
So take a hike, Capt. Knownothing. You've thrice proven yourself to be an authority on absolutely NOTHING.
You claim that a homosexual's "equal rights" are being violated in denying them the right to marry.
You claim, but never substantiate the allegation.
Why can't you substantiate it, anon? Why?
And I'm not equating them. I'm merely asking you to explain "how" or "why" they were "different".
For surely they are, aren't they?
It's a question asked, not a stating of facts.
And once you've provided a reason, perhaps we can see how well those "reasons" hold up for "other" cases.
... or more likely, how they don't.
People, people, people... Can't we all just agree that Kelly's gay cousin is going to hell and be done with it?
If you aren't equating why do you need the difference between Kelly's Gay Cousin and a pedophile explained?
Yep, Kelly's gay cousin IS going to hell (if he's not already in it).
If you aren't equating why do you need the difference between Kelly's Gay Cousin and a pedophile explained?
Because you won't explain the reasons why you think gay's "rights" are being violated in any way different than a pedophile or close family member's "rights" are being violated by a similar societal marriage prohibition.
You say that gay unions and hetero marriages are the same/ equivalent". I say they aren't. So either make your case, or shove it.
"FYI FJ, Captain Moron is a deity in mormon mythology look it up."
Anonimouse shows just how ignorant he is. Thank you for that laugh...it was sure a good one.
And Mormons have horns too...ROFL!!!!!!!!!
"Hey Kelly, how do you feel about FJ equating your cousing to a Pedophile?"
YOU, anon, are the one doing the equating.
Unlike you, I can read nuances that you cannot.
btw... the Mormon church contributed a mere 1% of the total contributions made to promote prop 8.
What about all the rest of the people who promoted it...and what about all those people who voted for it? Most of them even voted for Obama...go figure.
Sorry, I got my moron mumbo jumbo mixed up. Captain Moron was just some character in the Bible III (Book of Moron).
At least we can all agree that Kelly's pedophile cousin is going to hell. Go stick your head in a magical hat and read some seer stones.
You still can't explain how you didn't equate pedophiles to gays. If you need the difference explained, you think they are the same!
The difference that needs to be explained is why you are going ballistic on Mormons (who, as Kelly pointed out, contributed 1% of the total contributions to Prop 8) but are silent about the vast majority of African-Americans who (as Kelly also pointed out) enabled its passage.
Is their a double-standard there that likewise allows the same poster to race-bait fj's provocative but point-based use of a racial epithet but him or her self can say "white trash" in all seriousness and with presumed impunity?
(Because "victims" can be as offensive as they want?)
I'll bet that the right woman could win anon back from the dark side if she put her mind to it. ;)
Of course, she'd probably have to be under 12 to do it.
lol
Anon's misinformation about Mormons explains his misinformation about a lot of things. It seems to be a general trend.
There's no "seeming" about it. It's an established characteristic.
Post a Comment
<< Home