Republicus
"Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me. I lift my lamp beside the golden door." The Statue of Liberty (P.S. Please be so kind as to enter through the proper channels and in an orderly fashion)
68 Comments:
It appears that the sane adults stayed home.
The character development of liberals peaks in high school.
That's why when they become presidents, they behave like high school principals, or strut around between classes like prom kings with their "in-crowd" coterie of hero-worshipping nerds and cheerleaders.
Expect many more tantrums of this kind from the dying racist, reicho slime.
Their character development peaked just prior to falling out of their trees.
WHERE would he be without his obamaprompter?
Funny how anon attributes the actions of racist freaks with the right wing... as if we're the ones with a former Grand Kleagle of the KKK standing 4th in line for the US Presidency.
They're insane.
Yeah the aryan nation guys are lefties
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha
The aryan nation runs this blog. Often referring to michelle as "the coon's poon".
Yes, this is one of sites on our sicko list.
We roll over it regularly for fun and games.
This eunuch is almost as weak and stupid as Sayet.
"The lunacy never stops around here."
Gee, I wonder why.
Maybe because I let the lunatics run the asylum?
This is actually a microcosm of what's going to happen to the country now that you demented freaks are in power.
Then: "LOOK WHAT BUSH DID TO THE DEFICIT!!!"
Now: "LET'S QUINTIPLE THE DEFICIT!!!"
It's 13 o' clock, folks:
Cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo...
"The leader of this pack of whiners recently compared Bush's infamous 16 words to Obama's flub about being the 43/44 person to take the oath."
Pay attention. I said:
"You don't get it...I just pointed it out, and chuckled at the inherent shoddiness that lies beneath the polished veneer.
The point is that when Bush made his own flubs, you all went to town with it, wrote books, and had a circle-jerking orgy.
When he talked about the yellow cakes in the SOTU, you had scizophrenic breakdowns and insanely nitpicked why that constituted a High Crime worthy of Impeachment.
Then it turns out Joe Wilson IV, noyt Bush, was the liar.
'Oh, uh, okay, folks, let's MOVE ON, nothing to see here.'
And no apologies for spending millions of dollars and millions of vocal cords and over two years screaming about the 'Sixteen Words.' (ominously uttered in a 'The Smoking Gun' tone, because you're insane)."
--
"Clearly the consequences are equivalant (sic)."
President Bush was authorized by the Democratic Congress to go to war based on 23 charges, one of them being about WMD, which the administration--based on what Clinton's CIA appointee George Tenet told him--thought was a "slam dunk," and so the easiest to purvey to the American people.
Again, the "infamous" 16 words stand, and it was Joe Wilson who was the liar.
That you elevated him to a cause celebre' and went bonzai on Bush over just one 16 worded statement (that was true, anyway) among several others vis-a-vis just one of 23 separate articles to justify war--22 of which stand, and all as sanctioned by Democrats like Hillary, Kerry, Pelosi, and the rest--and then went on to call Bush a liar, a liar-liar-pants-on-fire, the Liar In Chief, A Lying Liar Who Tells Lies, and the Misleader In Chief and accused him of waging a sham, criminal war because there were no WMDs is just another example of why you are insane (if not retarded).
Joe Wilson is the liaer. You have it backward (big surprise).
You're dismissed, loser.
lol...let's see...they have Roberts flubbing the oath -- for which they blame Obama and say he's not legitimate.
And
they've taken to lying about Wilson who proved Bush to be a criminal warmonger.
Good start for the opposition.
This should get them a favored place in the ass ylum.
And
keep them out of power for forty years.
Meanwhile, Obama's throwing out all Bush's policies and taking the country back for smart, decent people.
They're all....
Dismissed!
Karl knew more a hundred fifty years ago than you peabrains do today:
Karl Marx, 1867
"Owners of capital will stimulate the working class to buy more and more
expensive goods, houses and technology, pushing them to take more and
more expensive credits, until debt becomes unbearable."
"The unpaid debt will lead to the bankruptcy of banks, which will have to
be nationalized, and the State will have to take the road which will
eventually lead to Communism. "
"lol...let's see...they have Roberts flubbing the oath -- for which they blame Obama and say he's not legitimate."
When did I ever say that Obama is not legitimate, fool?
"And they've taken to lying about Wilson who proved Bush to be a criminal warmonger."
You're a liar. The Bush-hater's representatives in Congress--Conyers and Kucinich--had committees specifically set up to dredge up hard evidence of criminality and drive Impeachment.
They got nothing.
"Good start for the opposition."
Good start for the Messiah. He commits a sophomoric, historical blunder in his Inaugural Address--and that from a politician who ran on "superior" competence, "thoughtfulness," and communication skills.
*Ex pede herculem.*
Funny John, but I cannot recall a single incident of "Michelle Obama" being referred to as "coon poon" here or at any other blog, do you? And if I and/or the commentators at this blog have never said it, then this idea of Michelle as "the coon's poon" MUST have originated in the head of some racist pretending NOT to be one so as to cast aspersions upon others.
Hmmmm.... I wonder just which commentator at this blog that could be...
btw - I don't recall this language being used either... "IMPEACH THE COON" but I think it speaks volumes about the racist character of someone who would falsely attribute it to another...
Can you imagine being desperate enough to try to make something out of that.
That's a demonstration of how far gone this pathetic party of retards really is.
Say again, Thersites?
You want us to believe that your racism isn't a "big deal"?
I think Obama's hardcore supporters all fancy themselves Decembrists in a new revolutionary movement. Just look at their new idols, which are just as hollow (and just as thin) as anything Marx ever dreamed up.
Joe Wilson was a dope who believed that if Niger wasn't ramping up yellow cake production, then Saddam just COULDN'T be looking into buying it. So is it any surprise then, that when not looking for something that was not logically possible, Joe Wilson failed to find it?
I know, "Huh?"
...and that has what to do with Michelle Obama?
The aryan nation runs this blog. Often referring to michelle as "the coon's poon".
So far, the only one to refer to Michelle as "the coon's poon" would be the aryan nation blogger... you.
...as far as you still having YOUR legs in the air for Obama, THAT is still pretty evident.
...but you projected the term "coon poon" onto Michelle Obama all by yourself.
The you come around here and start attributing all kinds of false statements and usages of the term to other people, ALL of which came out of your own overfed yet hyperactive imagination.
You've proven yourself more of a racist now than anyone here EVER was.
FJ,
The lefty children here will always try to cast their own racism on you.
They forget: WHAT WAS THE PARTY THAT FREED THE SLAVES?
Oh, but never mind all of that, that requires critical thinking. Lincoln could NEVER have been a Republican! The defense of slavery could NEVER have been the Democrats! They have never heard of John Calhoun, the Missouri Compromise or the the Nullification. You are casting pearls among swine.
I agree. They're desperate to keep their own heritage as slavery's principle defenders out of the public memory, so they deliberately run around falsely accusing Republicans of having traded ideological places with them.
But they can't seem to help themselves. The more they embellish their tales of Republican misdeeds, the more they expose they're own underlying racial animosities.
I think it has a lot to do with their need to make racialism a dependency and a 'victimization.' The more victims that a socialist regime has, the more government dependency they can count on. To even suggest that blacks, hispanics, eskimos, whites, american indians, etc., could ever have an even shake based on their own merits and abilities is to suggest that they would not need a massive federal government and a socialist agenda to "make things aright." Socialism is based on the tenet that only a centralized control system can have "social justice."
Ask the people in the Hungarian nation what they think of that system. Ask the people of Poland how all of that worked for them. Ask the people of Tibet how well that is going, and you will see that Marxism was a beautiful, farsighted, and fundamentally flawed ideology.
And, yes, I am calling the Marxist pigs on the carpet to explain away all the sins that they committed in the last century and are committing today.
You say he knew so much, and all he was doing was repeating local history that he himself had suffered.
Marx was brilliant in all the ways that that that an idealist can be an idealist. Reality turned out to be something a tad bit different, no? China, Russia, North Vietnam, North Korea.....tell me how many of these places are financial powerhouses and why they are or or not?
Let's go to something that looks like social justice. How is it social justice that Russia, sorry, the Soviet Union, lost better that 60 million people to political executions? Tell me how the US has come anywhere near that number of people in 250 years of history?
Tell me how it is societal justice to starve the people of North Korea to the tune of several millions based on the idea of social justice?
Do you even want to talk about China?
So far the record of the west has not been great by any means. However, even discounting the deaths in a disgusting regime like Nazi Germany, the west has nothing anything like the records I am calling up.
Do your best, Marxist pigs, to defend a century long record of death that has not been matched since Ghengis Khan.
Now, a fuller measure can be taken of what Bush's power grab meant for the United States... the federal debt ballooning, the economy in freefall, unemployment skyrocketing (along with bankruptcies and foreclosures), environmental degradation, two open-ended wars, and the nation's image around the world soiled by torture and other official crimes.
The west is guilty of the greatest genocide in human history, destroying the indigent populatons of two entire continents and raping their resources and decimating their animals to feed capitalist greed. The highly regulated, highly taxed society of the USA in the several decades after the New Deal was the high point in US history, and it's great decline began with the pernicious silliness of the Reagan revolution. Now, thankfully, this has been utterly exposed and is in the process of being very strongly corrected...with the support of SANE conservatives who have not hidden their heads in the sand like you weak, irrelevant, little fools.
Somebody call Bedlam, one of their inmates is on the loose, again...
they catch this FJ fool in the act and they deny it
siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiicko
fj said:
"Somebody call Bedlam, one of their inmates is on the loose, again..."
And on hyperbolic overdrive:
The west is guilty of the greatest...destroying...entire... raping...decimating...highly...highly...high...great... pernicious... utterly...very..."
And this:
"The highly regulated, highly taxed society of the USA in the several decades after the New Deal was the high point in US history..."
...is liberal historical revisionism in fine fictional form.
Roosevelt's New Deal did jack for the economy. The Depression ended with militarization and the mobilizing of the work force after Pearl Harbor.
Phelonius said:
"You are casting pearls among swine."
Very true. They're piggish lowlifes with mental problems due to the poisoned, Kool Aid swill they've been spoonfed as The Children and began guzzling with gusto as arrestedly-developed adolescents, where they remain (no matter how old they are).
I don't know. It looks more to me like Obamastormfuher Anonymouse caught herself, FJ!
She keeps using and reprojecting the racist insult.
Remarkably, the confirmation of President Obama's Attorney General nominee, Eric Holder, is being held up by Texas Republican Senator John Cornyn, who apparently is unhappy that Holder might actually investigate and prosecute Bush Administration officials who engaged in torture. Aside from this repugnant new Republican embrace of torture (which might be a winning issue for the lunatic fringe of the party and a nice way to further marginalize the GOP), any effort to protect Bush officials from legal responsibility for war crimes, in the long run, will not work.
Looks Very Good Indeed: "Bush's legal foes now Obama's legal team." "President Barack Obama is staffing his Justice Department with some of his predecessor’s fiercest critics, among them lawyers who were fired by President Bush or who quit jobs working for his administration." It's a beautiful morning! 1/25
We're right in the middle of another huge crash bought on once AGAIN by unregulated capitalism...and these morons are telling us all how wunnerful it is.
Capitalism failed long before communism did, and did so repeatedly with periodic crashes, but they keep resurrecting the monster over and over. As long as greedy pigs can make money from it and as long as enough historically ignorant twats like this can be fooled, it's a danger.
You're just jealous of Michelle, anonymouse, ADMIT it. You're also more of a racist than I'll ever be.
The ADULTS Do Indeed Take Over:
President Obama will direct federal regulators on Monday to move swiftly on an application by California and 13 other states to set strict automobile emission and fuel efficiency standards, two administration officials said Sunday.
The directive makes good on an Obama campaign pledge and signifies a sharp reversal of Bush administration policy. Granting California and the other states the right to regulate tailpipe emissions would be one of the most emphatic actions Mr. Obama could take to quickly put his stamp on environmental policy.
Mr. Obama’s presidential memorandum will order the Environmental Protection Agency to reconsider the Bush administration’s past rejection of the California application. While it stops short of flatly ordering the Bush decision reversed, the agency’s regulators are now widely expected to do so after completing a formal review process.
Once they act, automobile manufacturers will quickly have to retool to begin producing and selling cars and trucks that get higher mileage than the national standard, and on a faster phase-in schedule. The auto companies have lobbied hard against the regulations and challenged them in court.
Mr. Obama will use the announcement to bolster the impression of a sharp break from the Bush era on all fronts, following his decisions last week to close the detention facility at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba; tighten limits on interrogation tactics by Central Intelligence Agency officers; order plans to withdraw combat forces from Iraq; and reverse President George W. Bush’s financing restrictions on groups that promote or provide abortion overseas, administration officials said.
Beyond acting on the California emissions law, officials said, Mr. Obama will direct the Transportation Department to quickly finalize interim nationwide regulations requiring the automobile industry to increase fuel efficiency standards to comply with a 2007 law, rules that the Bush administration decided at the last minute not to issue.
If you white, you awrite.
If you brown, you kin come aroun.
If you black, stay way back.
Thanks for the admission! I knew you could do it.
The Democratic members should move immediately to outlaw the Reconstituted Republican party. It has no more purpose in this democracy than the Nazi party would. It is the party of exclusion, bigotry, hatred and unbridled greed. Dissolve it for the good of the nation and it's people.
More Frum...he doesn't mention that the followership is just as stupid:
The Story Behind the Clothes-in-Garbage-Bags-Story
Friday, January 23, 2009 1:15 PM
This morning, NewMajority.com broke news that the Republican National Committee has been stashing Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s campaign wardrobe in garbage bags. Our story has been widely picked up on the Web and has generated much controversy. Some further things need to be said:
This story is not a story about Gov. Palin. In this matter, the former vice-presidential nominee did exactly the right thing. She promised to return the wardrobe at the end of the campaign, and she did return the wardrobe.
The story is about a dysfunctional party apparatus. Because of their own inability to act, the RNC has left Gov. Palin looking like a promise-breaker – and left everyone who donated to the McCain-Palin campaign feeling like a fool.
The rage in the donor community about the wardrobe is real and intense. Our party was gasping for funds in 2008. We could not afford to waste a dime. More to the point: not every Republican donor is rich. Many are people to whom the $200 or $500 or $1000 they give represents a real sacrifice. They need to know that their sacrifice has not been used frivolously. The RNC’s protracted delay in donating the clothes as promised raises a troubling question: Will our party be embarrassed by what those bags contain?
Our party has been crippled by an all-pervading assumption at the center that if you just don’t talk about bad news, it will go away: whether it’s an extravagant wardrobe decision - or a bad job creation record. Our leaders cocoon themselves, refuse to hear unwelcome news, and reward yesmanship.
We have seen this attitude again in the reaction in some quarters to our story. If only New Majority had refrained from mentioning the obvious – that Palin’s promise had been left hanging in midair – why then nobody else would mention it either. And if nobody mentioned it, then it would disappear. Right? Not right. As soon as Gov. Palin returned to the national scene, so too would all the unanswered questions left over from the last campaign.
There is obviously something seriously wrong with the decision making at the Republican center. It is this leadership dysfunction that should be the central issue in the race for the chairmanship of the RNC. Tragically however it is generally assumed that the frontrunner in the race is the current incumbent: a man who apparently thinks that stuffing unwanted things in trash bags makes them magically disappear. Meanwhile, the man who offers a charismatic, telegenic face for our party – Michael Steele – is disregarded because he has accumulated some ideological speeding tickets as he fought and nearly won a tight senatorial race in one of the nation’s bluest states.
Gov. Palin remains a controversial figure in the Republican party. But the moral of this particular story is not a moral that bears on her. The moral bears on the RNC, an organization whose leaders think that evasion is a solution. It’s time for new leadership at the RNC and at all the highest levels of our party organization.
Keep spreading that love anonymouse, don't stop now. Tell us what a great leader Michael Steele (R-MD) is. He's GREAT, isn't he! They should toss that slacker Obama out and elect a REAL Republican to the presidency! Right?
Bubble Bubble, Toilet Trouble...
Yep, that's them all right.
So nobody here seems to have a problem with FJ calling the president a coon?
Here's the wingbat argument in a NUT shell...
the left is insane
the left is evil
the left holds all three branches of government
hahahahaha
the left is racist
blacks vote for the left by 95%
choke
unregulated capitalism is the only system
we are in the economic toilet again
cough
the right is goooood
the right supports torture, criminal aggression and fouling the planet
hack koff
the right is wunnaful
everyone hates the right
puke
You're a sock puppet.
When 95% of any one particular race votes for one party, that's the very definition of racist.
And your race baiting here every day PROVES it beyond a shadow of a doubt. Thanks for that!
Yes the archives are a beautiful thing.
You successfully race baited me into calling YOU the "coon's poon" once. Months ago. Big deal. Now get over yourself.
Had you not race baited us long before that incident you would never had achieved your hard won so-called "evidence." And as this thread successfully democnstrates, you've done little but race bait us since.
But it's also evident to anyone even causually reading this thread that you're obsessed with the topic, and your morphiological extensions of a single comment into various and sundry forms (ie - Michelle Obama is the "coons poon" and that we scream "IMPEACH THE COON"), only demonstrate that these falsely attributed insults are the sole product of your own imagination projecting your own racist thoughts onto us.
So do yourself a favor. Face the racist in the mirror and seek professional help. You need it.
So who forced you to call Michelle Obama the coon's poon? And who forced you to say "Impeach the coon" and "I hatz coons"? Look in the mirror.
"and you're a weak little piece of shit"
Easy, toughguy. I said it first.
And the plagiarising projection of the prognoses only confirms--yet again--the prognoses.
I have the power to obliterate your very existence here with a finger, any time I want to. But you amuse me (and provide me with excellent evidence for my research).
What you cut & paste and spew has no relation to reality. It is just noise, but I'm able to hear what you're really saying (never directly, of course): "Yes, you have my number. You know it, and I know it, but what matters is that, this time around, we were still able to fool a voting majority of the stupid American people, despite your efforts at telling them who we really are."
Yes. Unfortunately, the American people--collectively-- are not as smart as I thought (but is to be expected after decades of liberal dominance in the education system).
Fortunately, however, they're smarter than you think.
As an avid student of demographics,Lee Atwater foresaw that race was a long-term loser for the GOP. But in politics, what wins even short term prevails, and the GOP keeps going further down a blind alley of racial fear appeals and offensive language. Any reasonably astute observer would have seen the handwriting on the wall when Sen. George Allen, a frontrunner for the 2008 Presidential race, was torpedoed over a racist slur no one had even heard before! Macaca was a wake-up call that didn't wake them up.
Oh, I see. They weren't voting for Obama. They were all voting against the racism inherent in the Republican party... the one from which the only black man on the Supreme Court was appointed... and from which came the only black female Secretary of State in history...
The one members of your party like to draw as "sambos". Cuz "sambos" ain't really authentically black like "coons" is.
And then that LA Times reporter called Obama the "magic negro." Is he your magical negro, anon?
So keep holding on to and voting for your "magical negroes" girlie. That way you can hold onto your racism, and never have to confront it.
But that racism keeps peaking through the veneer more and more often. And for those of us who dwell "above the veil", we see what you're up to.
Black Republicans are a fascinating oxymoron; they're like compassionate conservatism or Jews for Jesus. The GOP's desperate attempt to elevate Ken Blackwell or Michael Steele to run the party is so laughably Orwellian when they haven't had a single African-American member of Congress since 2002, and don't have an African-American governor. They're trying to change appearances without changing their policies or their rhetoric.
When Ken Mehlman was RNC Chair in 2005, he made a notable apology to the NAACP for the Southern Strategy. But that came just after they'd illegally thrown tens of thousands of black people off the voter lists in the 2004 Presidential election in Florida. He didn't apologize for that.
FJ is a riot. First he pretends to be in the military now he's trying to say he isn't a racist just because he uses the word coon!
John, how about this...I come around here only once in awhile these days, cause these anonymousie commentors are boring me....yawn!!
I'm sorry... but perhaps anonymouse can tell us who used the word "coon" first?
Oh, and since her party isn't racist, she can call the president or the first lady a coon all she wants...
haha...really, Kelly? It looks like NOBODY ever goes to your blog except for three morons reciting to each other.
Hey, it's been a riot rubbing your little pig snouts in the failure of the conservative bowel movement, but it's time to let you slide back into the total irrelevance you deserve...tata twats.
Soon you'll be as dead as Sayet's or Kelly's. It's what you deserve.
Croo, so, where is your blog...it is so dead it never existed.
Well there you go again, making another racist assumptionn. Only a racist would assume that an African American's woman would necessarily be an African American as well.
And someone who uses a term "casually" uses it more than one time. Again, I would suggest a mirror check is in order.
Kelly you are such a quick wit. Must be hard to come up with something to say other than:
Get 'em John!
or
Come and read what everyone except me writes on "my" blog!
or
Gay people are evil... Where are my magic pants?
It is obvious mousie only skims through things...unless they will prove his point.
He scoures the archives in the attempt to catch FJ or any other commentor in saying something that will prove his point, yet still misses.
He glances at the blog I am a contributor on and can't see half of what is said. "OH MY G*D she is talking about gays...must be a gay hater..." One of my friends and a cousin are gay.
Liberals say they are for democracy...but only if it applies to them. When those who don't agree with their ilk speak out they are hunted out and bullied into submission.
All of your rants and insults have and will have no impact on the stands we take.
and, John, they are right...this blog is going no where...
I may be back when the format changes.
adieu
What do you want me to do, Kelly? Delete and ban them, and then preach to a choir?
That's what they do at the liberal blogs.
"Now let me be overly verbose in description as to bore you to death as does the moderator of this blog wherein people come to post political opinions of which I frequently disagree but must post in this overly descriptive style as it is in deference to the great moderators skill."
Hm. I'm not sure if I'm insulted or not.
John, I have come to your blog for years now. As a fellow conservative I had been boyed up by the things you share on your blog.
But lately, it has been difficult to venture into this place. I have talked with James and he feels the same as I do. In the interest of trying to outwit, out manuver, out whatever, those liberal trolls you may have lost two of your most ardent supporters.
If you feel you are preaching to the choir, I am sorry.
We have felt that you were so concerned about proving just how nasty these trolls were that you failed to hear the voices that have been there with you.
This place no longer provided any bouyancy (sp). Lately, every time I came here I walked away with my head down.
We already know how stupid these trolls are. You are still preaching to the choir on that issue. Because you will never convince them to the error of their ways. They could care less what you think.
If you decide that you would rather have us come to your blog then let us know.
If you would rather have those animousie liberals then I say, adieu.
It looks to me as if the anons have disappeared...
we will see
...
Post a Comment
<< Home