The Political "Elite"
Sound familiar?
posted by John | 11:15 AM
Republicus
"Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me. I lift my lamp beside the golden door." The Statue of Liberty (P.S. Please be so kind as to enter through the proper channels and in an orderly fashion)
- Choose Your Party
- Congratulations
- Assume The Position, "Stampede"
- Senator Obama: Don't Be A Fool
- cf.
- Say It, Evan. Right On.
- The Secret Weapon...UNLEASHED!
- Liberal Fascism
- "Debacle"
- My Verdict On The Great Debate
48 Comments:
Mental giants, first to last there.
They're just like simian, Uncle Joe (fathead), Karl (frankie), booger, and "rear guard."
(even though two or three of them are one and the same.)
You give these MySpace chirrins way too much credit methinks.
How? By comparing them to the cockroaches here?
R U kidding? They're practically indistinguishabe.
Ok, ok. Just trying to be fair is all. I was raised to try and be a gentleman even when the opposition is, in fact, a nest of cockroaches.
I cannot feel bad, though, because every time I want to ask them about specific policies, they cannot begin to even talk about them in any fashion at all. I have been called plenty of names, and even when I call them names back, they still will not debate any thing at all.
"Oh, I do not have time!"
"Wah, who would waste time on you?"
"We can call names but we cannot argue our way out of a paper bag..."
sheesh
Ralph Reed, once the religious right's boy savior, and Abramoff, the former head of the College Republicans, a "pioneer"-grade fundraiser for President Bush, and a stalwart friend of Texas Rep. Tom DeLay, come off as morally degenerate political savants in the Senate committee's files. Reed seems possessed by the gods of greed as he exults, "I need to start humping in corporate accounts!"
"I need to start humping in corporate accounts!"
"I need to start humping in corporate accounts!"
"I need to start humping in corporate accounts!" says one of the major SPIRITUAL LEADERS of the GREEDY OLD PARTY.
"I need to start humping in corporate accounts!"
You know, John, that you and I agree on most things. Where I have to disagree is that most leftists are evil because they want to be so. They are not that. Now, these particular cretins that call us names and cannot defend their own ideals are what they are defined by their own arguments.
These "whosits" are what they are because they do not know what they are, and as a result they are not evil anymore than the person that argues for things that they do not understand are evil.
My argument is that even though there are these cretins, the majority of leftists voters are not, by definition, evil.
They are trying hard to make a better world and they have to eat the main-stream press for information, and they do not think through the ramifications of what those ideals may really mean.
It makes them feel better to think that more taxation is good because it will make other people's lives better. It makes them feel good to restrict drilling for oil here because they have all been told that drilling for oil in other places is better than drilling for oil here. They firmly believe that the Americas are the great evil because that is what they have been taught through a socialist agenda.
Two things can happen.
One, we can drill for oil here and keep reduced taxes on our automobile industry and our textile industry and our drug industry, OR we can move those industries to other countries because we, here, are no longer willing to allow our own people a profit but are perfectly willing to let other counties do that job at our own expense. That is a choice we can make. A choice we cannot still make is that we are willing to let other countries do what we do best and still keep our standard of living.
You eco-nuts....do you not realize that India and China are going to willingly pollute way more than we
do already, but you are going to have NO SAY in that? Of course you do. You love Communists, right? No amount of pollution will b e enough to make you criticize Communist China.
How about India? A free nation that cares nothing about global warming. Are you willing to negate the ability of your own children to compete against them because of a pipe dream?
Greedy Old party EH?
Do you know what my Democratic ancestors fought for?
Slavery.
How greedy is slavery?
I have denounced that creedo. I will never vote for the party of slavery again. You want to go back that far in history it might do you well to actually read something of value.
hahaha...funny stuff, but haven't they heard about head nazi prescott von bush who started this whole universally hated KKKlan?
Earnest little wingbats getting all pouty...
thats even funnier stuff
everybody hates the sack of shit...
is that news to you?
actually?
you should be first in line
he destroyed your cruddy party
Wow...felonious is spouting so much riciculous crap that you'd have to totally re-educate the slobbering piece of goo in order to even begin the debate.
in addition he's part of a one percent movement
the others are part of a twenty percent movement
and we're supposed to take them through special ed in order to get them up to speed?
riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight
Oh, tell me again. I must have forgotten...
What relevant thing did you just say? About anything? At all?
Educate me.
What topic were you discussing?
"What relevant thing did you say, Ralph?"
"I need to start humping in corporate accounts!"
Didn't you hear me the first time?
Pull those grubby fingers ouchoo ears.
Oh that's right. You are incapable of discussing. I should have remembered the fucktards that come here to argue nothing at all.
Again...was there a specific topic that you wanted to lose?
Bring it up.
Otherwise, you do have to realize that there is no respect here for idiots that cannot argue for anything? Yes?
pussnally i thought this was exteeeeemely revolant and revolting ...it's all in the public record...
Ralph Reed, once the religious right's boy savior, and Abramoff, the former head of the College Republicans, a "pioneer"-grade fundraiser for President Bush, and a stalwart friend of Texas Rep. Tom DeLay, come off as morally degenerate political savants in the Senate committee's files. Reed seems possessed by the gods of greed as he exults, "I need to start humping in corporate accounts!"
"I need to start humping in corporate accounts!"
Is there not any one of you that has a sense of honor at all?
Not ONE?
At ALL?
You should be ashamed. Maybe you have no mothers, and that would explain some of that. Maybe you are not proud of your fathers. That would explain other things. Perhaps there are some amongst you that can talk politics?
Yes?
respeck?
we give you the info
you hide your head
what would we want from headless fools?
Sorry, Oily,
You actually responded,
but I am looking for Tom Delay in the current roles of the senate.
Can you tell me what seat he sits in?
have you at long long lahst suh no decency?
support the crooks feveh and evah?
das how it be?
eyeless
cannot think
or scphellink
remembers his Nazi upbringinks
and makes his own ass
a model for the rest of the ioiotinks
Hey now.
Just trying to bring to the table what has been brought before.
I cannot help it if you have no sense of humor.
remembers his Nazi upbringinks
yes im gilty
i was razed republican
then i rebuilt
oh sorry
funny stuff
i hadnt known how hard youd tried
Wasn't born then. Just bringing you truth.
as all those democratic national liberation fronts were democratic
ewe wun simple pecker head
naive enough to be well why frinstance a libertarian
but never a librarian
do you think those nazi boys might have been spinning?
kinda like
bloo skiez
no childs behind left alone
goin inta bring deemocrazy
compassionate GOOPers?
do yuh?
well do yuh punk?
This may put stress on your brain, but their name was:
Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterparte.
It means: the natioanl german solcialist workers party.
and no, I have no need for childish verse.
I know what it means, and I do not need to have to hide behind anything.
oh yah
troooooth in advertising
the nat dem lib fronts were all democratic by their very names
jeeeezus
simple twits
So, in other, adult terms. You refuse to accept reality, and you want to still talk in sophomoric verse that makes you look even more stupid? You have little to go for at this point, admittedly.
But, to give you still one last chance at sounding like an adult, can you not admit that after reading Mein Kampf, that it is just a re-rendering of certain Marxists with a sad twist towards genocide? Can you at least talk about that? is that beyond your ken?
Phelonius. Look at the deranged, Youtube freaks I posted. That's who you're dealing with.
A Good Sign: Tom DeLay's Wife Will Vote for the Libertarian Candidate for President Instead of McCain. May Tens of Thousands Follow Her Lead! 6/9
Why exactly are you arguing with this twit?.... It would seem that you should at least agree on a common language before a debate can take place. As it is you seem to be arguing with an nerbonics fucktard. His opinions are lost within his down syndrome ramblings. There might (or might not) be an opinion worth contemplating lost within there... I'll be damned if I'm going to spend the time to decipher it though.
Sal, You are right.
I waste time and effort dealing with a sophomore. Hell, I have had dandruff that was more serious.
Appreciate it you guys. This other fucktard will just have to realize that when grown-ups are talking he should be silent and learn something.
Sheesh John. maybe we should have a mandatory "height requirement" before they get on this ride?
poor blokes stymied
lemme leave ya wid happy thots
dasda tickit
Newsweek: Why the economy is worse than you think. For months, economic Pollyannas have looked beyond the dismal headlines and promised a quick recovery in the second half. They're dead wrong. 6/9
Well, I'm assuming there was something in there about me being an invention of Phelonius to support his argument. I support no argument, certainly when it isn't represented in a way that can be easily comprehended. I am no invention of Phel. Hell, most of the time I think he'd like to pretend I don't actually exist, so, pony up with a real argument in English, or any other language properly formatted and I might be willing to discuss it. Until then, I don't see a reason to engage in any discussion with you.
Is it all about you anonymous?
No.
Grab your little boy-parts and wonder off. I could care less about someone that cannot argue anything. Maybe your hand will grow eyes and realize how deprived it really is. No, this blog is not about you. You are meaningless.
You have proven time and again that you are unwilling to argue in any language about issues. Who cares what your brain cell thinks?
JB, fighting with this lot does nothing for you. It starts out ok, but then it gets more base as the argument goes along.
Honestly, you don't need to lower yourself to their level. You are a much better person than they are or ever hope to be.
James, you're dealing with the type that's exemplified by the third and fourth Youtube Bush-Hater from the top.
There's actually only one or two of them making most of the noise. Uncle Joe (a.k.a. fathead), Karl (a.k.a. "frankie"), simian, the ghetto poet, and booger may as well be just one loud-mouthed Bush-hating punk on drugs.
I recommend simply hitting the trashcan icon on ALL their posts for a while. Cranky babies need timeouts. Structure/discipline helps, too.
Just a thought.
I'm very tempted to, Berty, "free speech" be damned, because they're not ony virtually crying "fire" when there is none, but I feel I have every right to enforce a "dress code" of sorts for my own establishment (if not an age requirement), and these trolls are barefoot, ragged, unwashed, and diseased.
You can't reason with them and they're only disrupting other's free speech (which is part of their m.o., anyway).
Because of all that, like the detainess in GITMO, they're not deserving of the same Constitutional rights that people who actually respect the Constitution--and intellect, character, and language-- are.
However, they're own words and personalities make the best case for why that mindset should be kept powerless, so they can feel free to expose themselves as much as they want (which is preferable to their silent scheming).
"However, they're own words and personalities make the best case for why that mindset should be kept powerless, so they can feel free to expose themselves as much as they want (which is preferable to their silent scheming)."
Their words speak for themselves and devalue their position.
I still think a little troll containment would be nice. All their do is prove their mindset to those who already know of their mindset.
Preaching to the choir here, man.
"All their do"
THEY do... caught my own typo
Yeah, kinda like the crazy old guy with his pants around his ankles that sings "the old grey mare" song on the Simpsons....
Oh, the old gray mare, she ain't what she used to be,
Ain't what she used to be, ain't what she used to be.
The old gray mare, she ain't what she used to be,
Many long years ago.
Many long years ago, many long years ago.
The old gray mare, she ain't what she used to be,
Many long years ago.
The old gray mare, she kicked on the whiffletree,
Kicked on the whiffletree, kicked on the whiffletree
The old gray mare, she kicked on the whiffletree
Many long years ago.
Many long years ago, many long years ago,
The old gray mare, she kicked on the whiffletree
Many long years ago.
Sounds like a good argument for setting them back to silent scheming. The openly scheming is getting a little deafening.
Kinda sounds like so much kickin' on the whiffletree. :)
Post a Comment
<< Home