The Liberal Samurai Is Running Away?

Sanjay said:

John: Seems to me you jump all over Jeff for comments like Bs. There was a time when was a place for respectful dialogue. I'm outta here.

Dear Sanjay:

I just the caught the exchange.

The difference is that I "jumped all over" Jeff (Bush-hating liberal Jeff) not because he had launched all sorts of ad hominem attacks against me and turned the excellent blog of Republicus into an episode of the Jerry Springer Show while calling me all sorts of character-assassinating names in the process, like "bigot" to "racist" to "fascist" to "friggin' fascist" to "anglo-fascist" to "Christo-fascist" to "blind" to "moron," and "standing proudly behind each and every word" (like "I hope Bush gets assassinated!") but because he had refused to abide by two simple, reasonable rules:

I evicted him forever several times because he (1) wouldn't stop importing and postering the walls of the commentary section with lengthy, lefty screeds written by his intellectually drug-dealing gurus, and (2) because he offended the sensitive Kelly and caused her to leave.

As far as I can tell, Samurai, you're not a conservative mother of five kids who's on the board of the P.T.A...

...unless that really is you up there in the pic? :)

Do you really expect me to make Bargholz apologize to you?

Come on. More scata flies back and forth on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives (or at a European soccer game).

This whole thing's amusing to me.

Bargholz is a friggin' daisy-cutter--if not a MOAB.

Unfortunately, he's causing a lot of collateral damage with his Shock & Awe, and that includes unloading on you.

Bargholz, you were wrong about Sanjay's character.

Sure, he spouts a lot of nonsense, but that's just his transfused liberalism talking. :)

(He's been victimized by Paul Begala and Al Franken.)

But he's--hitherto, anyway-- an active guest, friendly, and overall courteous to everyone.

He is nowhere near the "troll" category.

There's a lot of crossed signals here, but you are wrong about your presumptuous conviction that he was a terrorist apologist (from what I understand, he wanted Zarqaowi executed).

From what I can tell from his own words, he's an apologist for Islam, and simply thinks that bin Laden doesn't know his Quran.

That he--along with others--refuse to acknowledge the demonstrable AND self-evident fact that Islam--as a whole--is undergirded by aggressive militancy is not the point here (though is at the crux of the debate).

You were wrong that he attacked you personally, at least to any extent that deserved a bazooka blast.

In fact, his response to you--from what is gathered, though the timeline of commentaries from post-to-post and back again is difficult to ascertain -- seemed quite calm and impersonal (with a touch of sarcasm and ribbing that is quite tame compared to the obligatory snideness I get from the usual lefty detractors):

You're gonna have to enlighten me on how our enlightened friend Jeff B. isn't contradicting himself. Or do I have to use a little nuance to read between the lines?

Just out of curiousity, do you let that guy hang around to make yourself look sane :)

You're response to that squirt-gun (well, he called you insane, but...) was this bazooka blast:

Libertine-sucks-a-guy (Liberal Samurai-takes-it-in-the-eye,)

I suspected that you were a Muhammadan pedophile who takes it up the ass by diseased monkeys, but I gave you the benefit of the doubt and made some polite overtures.

You attacked me like a rabid dog with a turd wedged in its ass, which is about ten steps up from a musloid, of course. You distorted everything I wrote, and lied flat-out when distortions wouldn't suffice. Your felch-breath must have rotted what few parts of your minuscule brain that the syphilis didn't. Congenital cretinism is a bitch. Don't blow your nose too hard or you'll lose what brains you have, dune-coon.

In fact, Sanjay is not a Muslim.

You were wrong again.

Is it possible that you were wrong on other presumptions, as well?

Consider:

I'm not a lying apologist like you, who posts idiotic propaganda with the sole intention of white-washing islame (not SIC John!).

In fact, it was Douglass who used the first "sic" for "Islame," indicating a misspelling. If in fact I did follow that up with a "SIC!" of my own (I really don't remember if I did, and I'm not about to go looking for that needle in that haystack), it was only to vociferously support the spelling of Islame.

And yet you assumed I was spell-checking you.

Also, you've made it clear that you do not support white-on-black racism:

I never excused anything the KKK does.

So I'll give you the benefit of the doubt when you were addressing guest Douglass that you were accusing him of stealthily projecting his own (as alleged by you) racism:

Give me a reason not to label you as a nigger cock-sucker. Oh! Did I mean African? That's what you wrote, when you REALLY meant NIGGER.

That more than crosses the line of decency, Mr. Bargholz, and is an unwarranted presumption. Are you a mind-reader? Republicus is not, so he will only assume that you were accusing Douglass of projection-- though undeservedly; Douglass has not demonstrated any racist tendencies in his language or argument--yes, I'm well-aware that racism goes both ways, but I found nothing "anti-anglo" in his arguments, either.

But as for you, what is this "dune-coon" business?

An Indian-American--i.e. Sanjay-- who is not even a Muslim and draws a hard-line against Islamic terrorists (again, he wanted Zarqaowi executed) is a "dune-coon?"

Republicus wouldn't condone such racist language even against any Bedouins who are terrorists, as neither skin-color nor topography cause the embracing of a violent ideology on their own, but to level a racially-loaded epithet like "coon" against Sanjay is unacceptable, Mr. Bargholz, and you distract from--and discredit--the excellent points you made, such as these (which warrant the rousing of righteous anger):

You excuse everything islame does--genocide, gang-rapes, murdering your daughter, mother, sister, wife and other female relatives, thievery, lying...but Christians are BAD. Yeah, right.

Yes, as I properly contrasted in my "Christian Vs. Muslim" series--and igniting a storm of controversy from those who begged to differ in the process, and, yes, attempted moral equivalence to level the playing field.

The Liberal Samurai was one of those who begged to differ, and said I was flirting with bigotry. I argued the fallaciousness of that conclusion--a non sequiter-- based on what was presented and what I repeatedly clarified.

Moving beyond Sanjay and referring to a general consensus reached among my knuckle-headed lefty detractors, how two posts that contrasted the behavior and words of two sets of African-Americans--one Christian, one Muslim-- of roughly the same age and same occupation from the same era and in the same ring led first to across-the-board bigotry...and then to racism is very strange indeed.

But contemplation of the reasoning behind the charge leads to a disturbing--and disgusting--revelation of the racist, anti-Christian liberal mind:

"Jesus is for whites, Muhammad is for blacks."

Is that it?

Right, so the Reverend Martin Luther Ling Jr. and the Born-Again Evander Holyfield are...Uncle Toms?

Go to hell (those who think that way).

Jesus is for everyone.

Muhammad for Muslims and Muslims only.

Anyway, Bargholz, cease and desist with the racially-loaded epithets, and, again, please point that bazooka of yours in the direction of the whiny and pesky "Fact-Master" Houstonmod (if he dares to show up again)...

...and Jeff, who is the one who actually attacked you on a personal level in his characteristically character-assassinating liberal way:

Psycho nut John B says...And Johns response to this psychotic fuck is...John, that’s what I was referring to you as being on board with this guy with. But apparently, if the paranoid psychosis fits………………….

Bargholz, he was the one who took your quotations out of context.

And notice how petty Liberal Jeff is: Uncomfortable with the association by first name with Jeff Bargholz, he decides to call him "John" B.

Yeah! So there!

Let's just clear up the confusion right here: Bargholz is Bargholz, and Jeff is Lee Harvey.

And I hope Sanjay gets out from under his bed and comes back to play. ;)