Republicus

"Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me. I lift my lamp beside the golden door." The Statue of Liberty (P.S. Please be so kind as to enter through the proper channels and in an orderly fashion)

Name:
Location: Arlington, Virginia, United States

Thursday, March 16, 2006

The Bush-Hater Is LUNCH



Lee Lee Lee Lee Lee Lee and Lee-Harvey said:

No need to feel sorry for me "sigh", doing damn good on this side of the fence. Overcompensating huh, took down that "read em and weep" post pretty quick and then attacked me real quick there bro. Hmm, who's overcompensating here??

And he bites the bait.

Republicus thanks him for proving the last post.

You're the one who swooped in and attacked the deleted "Read It And Weep" post mighty quick there yourself Lee Lee Lee Lee Lee Lee Lee Harvey, in a characteristically OVERCOMPENSATING attempt to discredit your host by posting pages and pages of other's assessments followed by the obligatory digression into some anti-Christian manifesto by a godless liberal.

And by saying that it is Republicus who is "overcompensating" and "attacking pretty quick" when you yourself are doing precisely those in the process proves that the rapid-fire knee-jerk ego-defense mechanisms in your bag of tricks aren't restricted to overcompensation, but rummage through the entire toolbox and most often pull out the liberal's favorite monkey wrench, i.e. Projection:

Placing unacceptable impulses in yourself onto someone else.

To wit:

Something must have bunched up your panties extra tight--the D.H. nexus, presumably--and you jerked upright and compulsively had to obsessively plaster the walls of the commentary section with "proof" after "proof" of what you are too blinded or dense to realize are just more proofs of what Republicus has been saying about the Bush-hating, liberal mind for many months now, and, in the process, quite beautifully proving the very post where you were pegged as engaging in overcompensation Lee Lee Lee Lee Lee Lee and Lee-Harvey.

And, of course: "hmm, it's like your obsessed with me or something."

Yes. Projecting all the way like jingle bells: "I know you are, but what am I?"

In your foaming-at-the-mouth attempt to discredit Republicus by debunking a chain email he received from D., you replicated entire paragraphs in your fevered cut-and-pasting (which nevertheless effectively questioned the veracity of the email).

Then you reverted back to your obsession of overcompensatingly plastering the walls of the commentary sections with more Bush-hating, Christian-demonizing manifestos by a pathetically-transparent Leftist who could just as well be the next James Bond villain (i.e. Dr. Goldhammer).

In your triumphant delusion that you are "outing" some "Vast, Right-Wing Christo-Fascist Conspiracy," you only out what Republicus has been saying all along: That what is at the core of your seething hate for the president is his "sectarian" faith of the Christian "cult."

Retro satana.

As to Republicus' removing of the post "Read It And Weep," Republicus had received other similar chain emails from others that he thought were worthy of posting.

One showed ranks of soldiers bowing their heads in prayer with an allegation that the ACLU was going to sue the U.S. Army over that.

Republicus found it curious that such an outrageous lawsuit was not picked up by watchdogs like Bill O'Reilly, and decided to do some Googling.

He found many online "corrections" that debunked that allegation, and decided it wasn't worth the effort of finding out the truth by more diligent--and time-consuming-- research.

Same thing here with the "Read It And Weep" post, a similar chain email which claimed that Oliver North identified Osama Bin Laden by name during the Iran-Contra hearings and presciently warned Senator Al Gore about him, the latter scoffing.

Apparently, North actually named Abu Nidal, according to the long-winded and replicated cut-&-pasted rebuttals that Lee Lee Lee Lee Lee and Lee-Harvey overcompensated with.

Keep in mind that Republicus has not himself researched either angle,but just shrugged and deleted what may very well be propaganda (both the post AND Lee Lee Lee Lee Lee and Lee's-Harvey's wall-papering comments).

However, a letter by North himself was included that denied the veracity, so Republicus could not stand behind it and wasn't willing to try.

The posted chain email also referred to 9/11 hijacker Muhammad Atta, and claimed that he was in an Israeli prison and released by the insistence of the Clinton Administration as the latter appeased the Jihadists so he could win for himself the "legacy" crown of bringing peace to the Middle East--however recklessly it took him to do it.

Apparently--though, again, Republicus has not researched it to arrive at a conclusion either way-- it was a different Atta.

All of that compelled Republicus to impatiently delete the whole kit-&-caboodle, and decided to fill the vacany by fly-swatting the pest Lee Lee Lee Lee Lee Lee and Lee-Harvey for the fun of it.

But as to the those circulating, chain-emails that appear in the box of Republicus from time-to-time, it's odd that the originating propagandist could think that he/she could get away with an easily-and readily-- disproven lie so widely-circulated.

Indeed, it would be no surprise to Republicus if a cunning Leftist actually began the circulation of emails like that just so it could be widely--and readily-- debunked, creating skepticism for anything else that comes along that reveals the Left for what it is.

Of course, that is the very skullduggery underlying the allegation that it is Rove himself who planted the National Guard story during the 2004 campaign for the Left to jump on and then be easily--and readily--debunked (and so create skepticism for anything else that comes along that is harmful to the President).

But conservatives don't think like that. Lefty's do, and simply projected what they would do: Intentionally bad-mouth their own under the guise of the opposition so they could then discredit the opposition for baseless bad-mouthing.

Anyway, poor Lee Lee Lee Lee Lee Lee Lee and Lee Harvey.

In order to "prove" that his overcompensating with Lee Lee Lee Lee Lee Lee Lee and Lee-Harvey is not a manifestation of the ego defense mechanism of overcompensation kicking in, he now goes around with the proof of the diagnosis in full, disgraceful display pretending that it doesn't bother him just so he could spite Republicus' diagnosis while accusing Republicus of overcompensating!

Heh, you do that Lee Lee Lee Lee Lee Lee Lee and Lee-Harvey.

P.S. "No need to feel sorry for me 'sigh', doing damn good on this side of the fence."

So stay there. Why do keep climbing over it?

*BURP*

Excuse me.

*sigh*

3 Comments:

Blogger the liberal samurai said...

Guys, guys, guys... Can't we all just get along? So John is a right wing nut bar (no offense John, keep in mind the Samurai frequently refers to himself a bleeding heart pansy); lets keep it civil.

As to the chains about Gore/Osama/North etc. I've never seen one coming from the left (aside from last years 60 minutes report about Bush's Guard Record). Why doesn't someone come up with some crazy chain letter about how Cheney shot a dude in the face or Laura killed her boyfriend in a car "accident"... Oh wait, those are both true...

12:28 PM  
Blogger John said...

Hey LS, what about this:

"But as to the those circulating, chain-emails that appear in the box of Republicus from time-to-time, it's odd that the originating propagandist could think that he/she could get away with an easily-and readily-- disproven lie so widely-circulated.

Indeed, it would be no surprise to Republicus if a cunning Leftist actually began the circulation of emails like that just so it could be widely--and readily-- debunked, creating skepticism for anything else that comes along that reveals the Left for what it is."

12:53 PM  
Blogger John said...

LS said:

"Guys, guys, guys... Can't we all just get along? So John is a right wing nut bar (no offense John..."

None taken. Just please don't call me an "Anglo-Christo-Fascist"
(like Lee-Lee-Lee-Lee-Lee-Lee and Lee Harvey did).

12:11 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home