The Bush-Hater Returns
"John, you just over think and complicate things too much. Bush is a prick, a criminal, a fascist in the absolute sense of the word, a pathological liar and a divider of Americans for political and financial/ideological gain, Plain and simple. You are an apologist, bullshitter, and blinded to whatever he says. I've never seen anyone work as hard as you do to defend such scum, and you do it willingly and sincerely. I'm sorry, but thats just the way it is dude. "
wuv, Wee Hahvey (i.e. Jeff)
posted by John | 2:15 PM
17 Comments:
Very typical of ranters...not much substance...lots and lots of name calling.
Sounds to me like someone needs a nap. That's what I do when the kids throw a tantrum like that.
Ya'll can't handle the truth, thats your issue. Pretty simple, Bush is a lying sack of criminal shit. No rant needed. Just facts. And just because I don't like Bush John, LOL, is anything but justification for your unnatural lust for the guy. You can blame us Bush haters for all his faults, but, dude, they are faults just the same. Their whole deal is falling apart, and yes, piece by piece, I am loving it. Sweet...
Hi Kelly. :)
Yes. Very typical.
Poor Lee Harvey. :(
He apparently thinks that thoughtful simplification--however long it takes your host to untangle the twisting and turning and snarled coils of the Bush-Hater's embroiled mind--is "over-thinking" and "complicating."
Republicus is not "a bullshitter" (sic). Lee Harvey himself admits as much in his next sentence: "...and you do it (i.e. argue) willingly and sincerely."
Such recklessness with words is indicative of a disordered mind.
And a disordered, illogical mind is often a case of immaturity with language.
The etymological root of the word "logic" is the Greek *logos,"* which means word.
Words are the building blocks of logic.
You can't follow a train of thought to its logical conclusion if the tracks laid down have gaps of missing ties or if you use a square peg for a round hole--or one made of clay, for that matter--to secure the ties.
The president is "a fascist in the absolute sense of the word?"
Does anyone here think that Lee Harvey has any understanding of Aristotle's Categories?
Does anyone here think he has even heard of them?
The definition of "fascism" is: "a system of government characterized by dictatorship, belligerent nationalism and racism, militarism, etc.--first instituted in Italy 1922-1943" (Webster's New World Dictionary).
Yes, and it reached full bloom, in Italy, with Benito "Il Duce" Mussolini...
...who, in 1909, was secretary of the SOCIALIST TRADE UNION (uber-fascist Hitler, too, it should be added, was politically raised in the German Socialist Party).
Those two were anti-conservative to the core.
Like Lee Harvey.
Can't you just picture Lee Harvey standing behind a podium, beneath a huge banner saying something like "POWER TO THE PEOPLE!", wearing an Oliver Hardy moustache and sporting a brownshirt, and shouting out the posted quote in a heavy German accent, and waving his head about with bulging eyes and veins and shaking his fists?
"BUSH EEZ A PREEK! A KREEMEENAL! BULLSHEET! BULLSHEET! LIES! LIES! LIES! BLY-EEND! BLY-EEND! BLY-EEND DEFEND-SUCH-SKOM!!!"
And the frauleins swoon.
The president is "a fascist in the absolute sense of the word?"
Is that absurd, insane, or a projection?
Maybe Lee Harvey is functionally illiterate (too).
He has demonstrated that he doesn't speak English.
He talks American (in the worst connotative sense).
Republicus will now, once again, translate for you:
1) Republicus is not an "apologist."
*Au contraire,* he proves that it is Bush-Haters like Lee Harvey who should be apologizing to the President.
And to the American people for the confusion and dissent they sow and propogate.
But they--Lee Harvey and his vile crowd-- would never, ever admit that they're wrong, so no apologies.
Wait a second: Aren't they always accusing the administration of that kind of arrogance?
Never admitting to a mistake?
A pig-headeness?
Yes. They always are.
2) Republicus is not "blinded to whatever (the president) says."
Although such a construction of words makes little sense (he should have used "deaf" instead of "blind," and actually meant--Republicus guesses-- the opposite "of blinded to," anyway, for starters), what the moonbat here (as inspired by blogger Moonbat Abattoir) is trying to say is that Republicus is a Bushbot (as apparently coined by blogger Gothamimage), or a mindless automaton who "hears and obeys, Master."
Any regular reader with the slightest power of discernment and possessing a sound intelligence uncompromised by personal, emotional issues will attest to Republicus' wide-open-eyed-- or even cold-eyed-- vision.
You may disagree with the stuff of opinions that Republicus has his own fair share of, but is he "blinded?"
Does Republicus scream as one who is sitting in the dark and sees nothing but the phantoms of his own fevered imagination?
Or does he provide coordinates?
Reference points?
Is he not a lighthouse?
Does he not lift his lamp beside the golden door?
What can Republicus possibly be "blinded to (sic) whatever (the president) says?"
His dazzling eloquence?
His hypnotic gifts of oratory?
His goofiness?
As the Hitch has sneered: "Don't make me laugh."
It's projection.
It is Lee Harvey HIMSELF who is "blind/blinded/deaf/deafened to (or 'by,' what? whatever) whatever the President says."
Why?
Because the President is "a pathological liar," so no matter what he says, Lee Harvey is deaf to it.
Why?
Because Lee Harvey is deafened by the insidious Bush-Hating propoganda that he stuffs his ears with because it validates his disgusting world-view, and it creates a fixating set of blinders which block out the surrounding environment from his line of vision that can now only see a "dangerous" and despised "scum"--i.e. the duly-elected President of the United States of America-- in the cross-hairs of his tunnel vision:
"I hope Bush gets assassinated!"he actually seethed.
Are you checkin' this out, M.A.?
THIS is a "moonbat."
Jeff just proved my point by his response.
French Lessons 101:
A "bullshitter" is generally understood to mean someone who willfully speaks falshoods for one purpose or another, so for Lee Harvey to immediately follow his accusation that Republicus is a "bullshitter" with the characterizing of the "bullshitting" as being commited with willful sincerity is indeed evidence of Lee Harvey's reckless reasoning abilities and/or immaturity with language.
"Bullshit" does not a "bullshitter" make. So if Republicus is-- hypothetically speaking-- just plain wrong about what he says, he may be saying a lot of "bullshit," but he's not "bullshitting," and he can assure his people that he's quite sincere (if not sarcastic).
You can judge Republicus on his command of the facts, but not on his honesty/sincerity.
Republicus would not call Lee Harvey a "bullshitter" because it is evident that the scoundrel is also quite willfull and sincere (if not insane) in his own right (though Republicus would not use the word "honest").
But he is--in fact-- spouting a lot of bullshit, ladies and gentlemen.
Such ambiguity over the meaning of "bullshitter" vs. "bullshit" is residue from the mass confusion caused by eight years of the compulsive conniving of the Clinton era and another two years over the faulty intelligence on WMD.
The former was comprised of a lot of "bullshitting," the latter of just plain "bullshit," but the meanings--one coming in so quickly on the heels of the other--morphed in the inverting and projecting mind of the Clinton-Loving Bush-Hater.
When President Clinton got busted for "bullshitting," he got impeached.
The Left stood as one and cried: "BULLSHIT!"
A few years later, David Kay came back weaponless from his weapon-quest in Iraq and told the president that the intelligence was bullshit.
The Left stood as one and cried: "BUSH WAS BULLSHITTING!"
So when Lee Harvey accused Republicus of being a "bullshitter," that was bullshit, even though he truly believed that and was therefore not "bullshitting," but now you understand why he's so full of shit.
Kelly said: "Jeff just proved my point by his response."
Yes. He does that. But he is bereft of self-awareness and doesn't realize he's doing it.
You're an excellent sideshow! Business is booming! Keep it up!
And thank you for my next post! :)
Resorted to censoring your posts republicus. The stench of fear man, it's just not pretty.
Exploiting any personal information you have on Republicus from college days (before you flunked out)--mentioning family (he snidely referenced Republicus' mom), hometown, etc.-- is the stench of angry desperation and malice, and it is not pretty.
And of course will be promptly deleted.
Look, you act like an idiot, your gonna get called an idiot. What are you gonna do. You want to shut out all dissent as the rants of an inmature man so you don't have to acknowledge there just might be something there and you could be "gasp" completely wrong about all you believe in. Go right ahead, doesn't change the facts, facts so glaring that anyone who wants to see the truth can, but you don't want to. You want to hold onto your beliefs and spread your lies, and hatred and ignorance around like the plague. Your ideas and values are wrong for America. America is better than that, and we should know better than that. You want to lower yourselves to the level of the people you despise, condone torture and murder, spread terrorism through failed and criminal policies, go right ahead. But your wrong, you always have been on this issue. Bush is bad for America, for democracy and you two are living breathing proof of that.
"Your ideas and values are wrong for America."
Jeff
You said that you have "nothing to hide."
You already shamelessly--or moronically--asserted that you think Bush is a "fascist in the absolute sense of the word," but for the third or fourth time:
Do you classify yourself as a liberal?
Do you believe that the United States should be subservient to the edicts of the United Nations?
Do you think taxes are too low?
Do you equate American Evangelicism with the Islamo-fascism of the Taliban?
Do you think "corporatism" is a systemic morbity and should be regulated by the State?
Do you think that Ike's warning of an all-encompassing and overweening "Military Industrial Comples" has gone unheeded and is now realized, that the nation is afflicted with excessive "militarism?"
Do you believe the ACLU is good for America?
Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, and yes.
Is that what you mean by "America is better than that?" and "We should know better than that?"
"You want to hold onto your beliefs and spread your lies, and hatred and ignorance around like the plague."
Holy s**t! LOL! PROJECTION!
*If* I had any inkling of seeing *Jeff's* side of things I certainly don't now. He lost his credibility in my book with his vulgar way of *explaining* it.
And if being an *idiot* means that I DON'T see things as he does...count me in.
Quite honestly, I am finding the whole thing quite amusing.
Easy for you to say, Kelly. I'm the one who has to wade in to that snake-pit mind and start hacking off hissing and spitting heads like Heracles dealing with the Lernean Hydra.
:)
The amusing part being referred to an *idiot*.
We certanly appreciate that you do "wade in to that snake-pit mind and start hacking off hissing and spitting heads like Heracles dealing with the Lernean Hydra."
Well someone's gotta do it.
But it's good to feel appreciated. :)
Post a Comment
<< Home